From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Corley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-13045 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 24, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-13045

10-24-2016

TERRANCE D. JOHNSON, #317128, Plaintiff, v. TAMMARA CORLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration concerning the Court's dismissal of his pro se civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, Plaintiff challenged the validity of his 2012 probation revocation asserting that his Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments were violated by the use of false/fraudulent information during those proceedings. He named probation officers, supervisors, and the Saginaw County Circuit Court Probation Department as the defendants and sued them in their personal and official capacities. He requested monetary damages for his alleged unconstitutional imprisonment. The Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); see also Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005).

Plaintiff's motion must be denied. A motion for reconsideration which presents issues already ruled upon by the district court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). Plaintiff raises such issues in his motion. The Court properly dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. Plaintiff has not met his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled or his burden of showing that a different disposition must result from a correction thereof, as required by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. This case is closed. No further pleadings should be filed in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen

United States District Judge Dated: October 24, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 24, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135


Summaries of

Johnson v. Corley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-13045 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Corley

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE D. JOHNSON, #317128, Plaintiff, v. TAMMARA CORLEY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-13045 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 24, 2016)