From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2017
324 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

01-04-2017

Carvaughn JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Vishal K. Garg, in support of the petition. James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Vishal K. Garg, in support of the petition.

James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Carvaughn Johnson's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 95, 140 A.3d 1087 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the claim that defense counsel's failure to investigate alibi witnesses was deficient performance was not reviewable because the petitioner failed to adequately raise the claim before the habeas court?

"2. Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that defense counsel's failure to present an alibi defense was not deficient performance?

"3. Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the petitioner was not prejudiced by his counsel's failure to present evidence of third party culpability?"


Summaries of

Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2017
324 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Carvaughn JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 4, 2017

Citations

324 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)
152 A.3d 545

Citing Cases

Outing v. Warden

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Brian S. v. Commissioner of Correction, 172 Conn.App. 535, 540, 160 A.3d…

Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr.

We granted certification as to whether (1) the petitioner's claim that defense counsel performed deficiently…