From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-00496-EPG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00496-EPG

09-13-2021

LYNELL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT OPENING BRIEF

(ECF No. 16)

Plaintiff Lynell Johnson (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. (See ECF No. 1.)

On September 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to extend the time to file and serve her opening brief. (ECF No. 16.) According to the motion, an extension is sought due to the number of cases Plaintiff’s counsel must brief in this District, the Northern District of California, and the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals. (Id.) Plaintiff requests a “thirty (30) day extension of time until October 11, 2021” to file her brief, and further requests that the Commissioner’s responsive brief be due by November 10, 2021. (Id.) Plaintiff “does not know whether Defendant agrees or objects to this extension” because Plaintiff’s counsel did not contact opposing counsel prior to filing the motion. (Id.)

On September 10, 2021, the Commissioner filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 17.) The Commissioner opposes the motion because counsel has eight district court briefs due to be filed between November 1 and 10, 2021. (Id.) The Commissioner’s counsel could file a responsive brief if Plaintiff were to file her opening brief by September 20, 2021, but not thereafter because of expected recall to active duty to perform military orders. (Id.) If the Court grants Plaintiffs motion, Defendant requests an extension until January 10, 2022 to file her responsive brief. (Id.)

Having considered Plaintiffs motion and the Commissioner’s response, the Court will grant Plaintiffs request and extend the deadline to file her opening brief to October 11, 2021. However, the Court will further extend the deadline for the Commissioner to file a responsive brief to January 10, 2022. The parties are strongly encouraged to contact opposing counsel to seek to obtain a stipulation prior to filing future motions for extensions of briefing deadlines.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff s motion for an extension of time to file her opening brief (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED IN PART;
2. Plaintiff shall file and serve an opening brief no later than October 11, 2021;
3. The Commissioner shall file and serve a response to Plaintiffs opening brief by no later than January 10, 2022; and
4. All subsequent deadlines are extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-00496-EPG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:LYNELL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00496-EPG (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)