From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 28, 2024
Civil Action 23-CV-4738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-CV-4738

10-28-2024

RAHEEM JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. GINA CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff Raheem Johnson's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9), it is ORDERED that:

1. Johnson's Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against CottonWilliams and Reasons based on being served contaminated food is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Johnson's claims against Gina Clark are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Clark as a Defendant.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the following as Defendants: the Department of Corrections, Kenneth Miller, and Laurel Harry, 4. The Clerk of Court is specially appointed to serve written waiver requests on the following Defendants, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d), to effect waiver of service:

a. Kitchen Supervisor Cotton Williams b. CFSM M. Reasons

5. The waiver of service requests shall be accompanied by a copy of the Amended Complaint and shall inform the Defendants of the consequences of compliance and failure to comply with the requests. The requests shall allow the Defendants at least 30 days from the date they are sent (60 days if addressed outside any judicial district of the United States) to return the signed waivers.

6. If a signed waiver is not returned within the time limit given, the Court will issue subsequent orders to attempt to effect service by the U.S. Marshal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3).

7. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED not to issue summonses until further order of this Court.

8. No discovery will take place in this case until the Court enters a scheduling order or other order permitting discovery. This means the Court will not consider discovery motions unless or until discovery is authorized. At this early stage of the case, it cannot yet be determined if a hearing or discovery will be necessary for the disposition of this case.

9. Copies of papers filed in this Court are to be served upon counsel for all other parties (or directly on any party acting pro se) in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b), and Local Rule 5.1.2 where applicable, and should include any certificate of service required by Rule 5(d).

10. Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. The parties shall file all motions, including proof of service upon opposing parties, with the Clerk of Court. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules are to be followed. Johnson is specifically directed to comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1 and serve and file a proper response to all motions within fourteen (14) days. Failure to do so may result in dismissal.

11. Once discovery is permitted, Johnson should note Local Rule 26.1(f) which provides that “[n]o motion or other application pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing discovery or pursuant to this rule shall be made unless it contains a certification of counsel that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute.” In accordance with Local Rule 26.1(f), Johnson shall attempt to resolve any discovery disputes by contacting Defendants' counsel directly by telephone or through correspondence.

12. No direct communication is to take place with the United States District Judge or United States Magistrate Judge with regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk of Court.

13. In accordance with Local Rule 5.1(b), the parties should notify the Clerk's Office of a new address within fourteen (14) days of an address change. Failure to do so could result in court orders or other information not being timely delivered, which could affect the parties' legal rights.

14. Johnson may file a motion for voluntary dismissal of this case at any time if Johnson decides not to pursue it. In making this decision, Johnson should consider the statute of limitations.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 28, 2024
Civil Action 23-CV-4738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Johnson v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:RAHEEM JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. GINA CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 28, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-CV-4738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2024)