From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. City of Satsuma

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Dec 13, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-00255-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-00255-KD-MU

12-13-2022

REGINALD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SATSUMA, AL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KRISTI K. DUBOSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated October 25, 2022, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1) Plaintiff is ENJOINED from pursuing the instant complaint against Maurice Kirk Harless and/or MKH Properties in this Court or any other forum and the instant complaint against Maurice Kirk Harless (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice;
2) The motion to dismiss filed by the City of Satsuma is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint against the City of Satsuma (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice;
3) Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Judgment for Fraud on the Court Under Rule 60(d)(3) in United States District Court (Doc. 5) is DENIED;
4) Plaintiff's Motion for Equal Protection of the Law (Doc. 16) is DENIED;
5) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint for a More Definite Statement as Motioned for in the Defendant's Response to the Court (Doc. 18) is DENIED as futile; and
6) Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment (Doc. 21) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Johnson v. City of Satsuma

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Dec 13, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-00255-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. City of Satsuma

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SATSUMA, AL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-00255-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Dec. 13, 2022)