From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 13, 2017
Civil No. 3:17CV514 (E.D. Va. Sep. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:17CV514

09-13-2017

DUANE WAYLAND JOHNSON, Petitioner v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on August 8, 2017, the Court directed Petitioner, within eleven (11) days of date of entry thereof, to show cause as to why his § 2254 Petition should not be dismissed for lack of exhaustion. The Court warned Petitioner that a failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the § 2254 Petition without prejudice to re-file after Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies for all of his claims. On August 23, 2017, the United States Postal Service returned the August 8, 2017 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER" and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 9/13/17
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 13, 2017
Civil No. 3:17CV514 (E.D. Va. Sep. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

Case Details

Full title:DUANE WAYLAND JOHNSON, Petitioner v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Sep 13, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 3:17CV514 (E.D. Va. Sep. 13, 2017)