holding that, "[o]n a motion to dismiss for improper venue, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing that it has chosen the proper venue" (citing Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. National Mines Corp., 90 F.R.D. 67, 69 (S.D.N.Y. 1981))
Summary of this case from Catipovic v. TurleyNo. 96-7474.
December 23, 1996.
D.Conn., 918 F.Supp. 543.
AFFIRMED.
holding that, "[o]n a motion to dismiss for improper venue, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing that it has chosen the proper venue" (citing Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. National Mines Corp., 90 F.R.D. 67, 69 (S.D.N.Y. 1981))
Summary of this case from Catipovic v. Turleygranting motion for summary judgment; "While the methods by which [the plaintiff's] performance was reviewed and by which he was eventually terminated may not have been ideal employment practices, they do not constitute 'extreme and outrageous' conduct."
Summary of this case from Felekey v. American Telephone Telegraph Companyaffirming injunction enjoining village from denying equal protection of laws by enforcing its zoning code and requiring village to revise zoning code; zoning board was not named as defendant
Summary of this case from Bikur Cholim, Inc. v. Village of Suffernobserving that when factors other than the defendant's fraud are an intervening direct cause of a plaintiff's injury, such as his or her poor performance, the same injury cannot be said to have occurred by reason of the defendant's actions
Summary of this case from McConkey v. AON Corp.Full title:Johnson v. Chesebrought-Ponds, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Dec 23, 1996
ted a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Yitzchok LeBlanc-Sternberg, the rabbi of plaintiff Park Avenue…
LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherAlthough this case has been the subject of a number of decisions, the decision of October 15, 1996, which was…