From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Chauhan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:17-cv-00138-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00138-KJM-AC

09-27-2021

Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Haneshinder Singh Chauhan, Defendant.


ORDER

On May 18, 2021, plaintiff requested an entry of default as to defendant Haneshinder Singh Chauhan. See ECF No. 66. Shortly thereafter, the Clerk of Court declined plaintiffs request. ECF No. 67. On June 1, 2021, the court directed plaintiff to take appropriate action to cure the identified deficiencies and warned plaintiff the court “anticipate[d] dismissing the case against defendant Haneshinder Singh Chauhan” if plaintiff did not “adequately brief the issue of damages in this case.” Minute Order, ECF No. 68. No. further action has been taken by plaintiff to complete litigation of this case.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed and closed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Chauhan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:17-cv-00138-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Chauhan

Case Details

Full title:Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Haneshinder Singh Chauhan, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-00138-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)