From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2016
Case No. 4:16 CV 1310 CDP (E.D. Mo. Sep. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 4:16 CV 1310 CDP

09-16-2016

RASHEEN JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. JAY CASSADY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on petitioner's motion for discovery. The motion will be denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent's time for responding to the case management order has not yet expired, and it is possible that some or all of the materials sought by petitioner will be filed in response to the case management order. If not, petitioner may refile a motion in compliance with Rule 6 for the Court's consideration at that time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for discovery [6] is denied without prejudice.

/s/_________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 16th day of September, 2016.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2016
Case No. 4:16 CV 1310 CDP (E.D. Mo. Sep. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Cassady

Case Details

Full title:RASHEEN JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. JAY CASSADY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2016

Citations

Case No. 4:16 CV 1310 CDP (E.D. Mo. Sep. 16, 2016)