From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Casillas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:21-cv-0411 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0411 KJN P

10-18-2022

KIFA MUHAMMAD AKA MARCUS JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MARIO CASILLAS, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 30 DAYS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF “UNDISPUTED” FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On October 14, 2022, defendants filed a motion for extension of time to file a reply to plaintiff's declaration and statement of “undisputed” facts in opposition to motion for summary judgment.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion (ECF No. 34) is granted; and
2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendants shall file their reply.
All other provisions of the Court's November 22, 2021 Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23) shall remain in full force and effect.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Casillas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:21-cv-0411 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Casillas

Case Details

Full title:KIFA MUHAMMAD AKA MARCUS JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MARIO CASILLAS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-0411 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)