From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Capital One, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 4, 2014
No. 3:13-CV-879-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:13-CV-879-M-BH

03-04-2014

REGINA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A., Defendant.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court; provided, however, that the date the Plaintiff received the Notice of Dismissal and Right to Sue from the EEOC, which is dated November 13, 2012, was either November 13 or 14, 2012, not November 12, as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation states at Paragraph 1. See 1st Magistrate Judge Questionnaire Answer 2: doc 9-1 at pages 2, 3, 4, and 14. This connection does not impact the disposition of this case.

___________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Johnson v. Capital One, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 4, 2014
No. 3:13-CV-879-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. Capital One, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:REGINA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2014

Citations

No. 3:13-CV-879-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2014)