From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. California, Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:21-CV-2348-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2348-WBS-DMC-P

10-04-2022

DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 17, for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order, ECF No. 15, denying counsel.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The order at ECF No. 15 is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 17, is denied; and

2. The Magistrate Judge's order at ECF No. 15 is affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. California, Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:21-CV-2348-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. California, Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-2348-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)