Opinion
No. 2:19-cv-02439 JAM GGH P
05-05-2020
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
ORDER
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 30, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 5. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 6.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. ////
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 30, 2019, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed; and
3. This court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. DATED: May 5, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE