From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Cain

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Sep 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0590-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0590-FJP-DLD.

September 30, 2009


OPINION


After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which an objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants Tim Delaney and the Angola Boxing Association shall be dismissed for failure of the plaintiff to serve these defendants within 120 days as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over all state law claims, and that the Motion to Dismiss of the remaining defendants shall be granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendant Burl Cain and dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against the remaining defendants, with the exception of the plaintiff's claim that defendants Joe Lamartiniere and Preseley Bordenlon were deliberately indifferent to the plaintiff's safety and well-being by failing to control or segregate a co-inmate who they knew posed an unreasonable danger to the physical safety of other prisoners.

Rec. Doc. No. 12.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the state law claims shall be dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Cain

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Sep 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0590-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Johnson v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:WALTER E. JOHNSON, JR. (#104558) v. N. BURL CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0590-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Burgos v. Long

While the lack of a prior complaint is a factor to consider, it does not, as a matter of law, equate with…