From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Cadle Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 3, 2008
No. 02-08-181-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2008)

Opinion

No. 02-08-181-CV

Delivered: July 3, 2008.

Appeal from the 158th District Court of Denton County.

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On June 3, 2008, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Cadle Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 3, 2008
No. 02-08-181-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Cadle Co.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JOHNSON, APPELLANT v. THE CADLE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 3, 2008

Citations

No. 02-08-181-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2008)