From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Bradshaw

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 13, 2006
Case No. 1:03 cv 2509 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03 cv 2509.

October 13, 2006


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS


Petitioner Anthony Johnson filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on 8 December 2003. (Docket # 1). The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. to file a report and recommendation. (Docket # 7). Magistrate Judge Baughman filed his report and recommendation on 27 July 2006, recommending that the Court dismiss and/or deny Johnson's amended petition for the writ of habeas corpus. (Document #33).

None of the parties have objected to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Therefore, it must be assumed that the parties are satisfied with it. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is adopted, and petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Bradshaw

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 13, 2006
Case No. 1:03 cv 2509 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. Bradshaw

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 13, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:03 cv 2509 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2006)

Citing Cases

Webster v. Warden, Belmont Corr. Inst.

It therefore appears that petitioner procedurally defaulted his severance claim in this federal habeas corpus…

Jennings v. Harris

Courts in this district have found Ohio Appellate Rule 16 to be an adequate and independent state rule upon…