From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Bowser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 18, 2020
No. 2:18-cv-00048-SU (D. Or. Jun. 18, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-00048-SU

06-18-2020

JAMES EARL JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. T. BOWSER, Respondent.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [54] on April 16, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court deny the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [33]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation [54]. Accordingly, the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [33] is DENIED and this this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability on the basis that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Ju ne 18, 2 020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Bowser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 18, 2020
No. 2:18-cv-00048-SU (D. Or. Jun. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Johnson v. Bowser

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EARL JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. T. BOWSER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 18, 2020

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-00048-SU (D. Or. Jun. 18, 2020)