Johnson v. Bowen

2 Citing cases

  1. Relaford v. Danforth

    No. CV422-231 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2024)

    As this Court, and others, have previously explained, “alleged defects in an indictment assert, at most, legal insufficiency, not the factual innocence required to avoid the time bar.” Johnson v. Bowen, 2022 WL 17960456, at *2 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 27, 2022); see also, e.g., Keys v. Wilkins, 2023 WL 3449132, at*4 (S.D.Miss. Mar. 15, 2023).

  2. Keys v. Wilkins

    Civil Action 2:22-cv-139-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Mar. 15, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Sarringar v. Davis, 2018 WL 3640208, at *2 (N.D. Tex. July 6, 2018). “[A]lleged defects in an indictment assert, at most, legal insufficiency, not the factual innocence required to avoid the time bar.” Johnson v. Bowen, 2022 WL 17960456, at *2 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 27, 2022); see also Sarringar, 2018 WL 3640208, at *2 (holding that a claim of defective indictment was a legal innocence claim not an actual innocence claim and thus barred by AEDPA's statute of limitations); McCune v. Shivers, 2019 WL 2218999, at *1 (S.D.Miss. May 22, 2019) (holding that a defect in the indictment “would not establish actual innocence”); Burell v. Dir., TDCJ-CID, 2022 WL 2865867, at * 10 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2022)