From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Boitano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
21-cv-01402-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-01402-SVK

07-19-2021

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN F BOITANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO VACATE ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF LIMITED DISCOVERY

Re: Dkt. No. 19

SUSAN VAN KEULEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Having reviewed Defendant's request to vacate the Court's June 30, 2021 order permitting Plaintiff to conduct a limited Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant (Dkt. 18 (the “Discovery Order”)), the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Plaintiff s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice is improper under the terms of the Discovery Order and is therefore stricken.

2. Within three (3) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may serve an amended Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice that complies with the Discovery Order.

3. The deadlines set forth in the Discovery Order are extended by 14 days.

4. Except as set forth above, Defendant's motion to vacate the Discovery Order is denied without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Boitano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
21-cv-01402-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Boitano

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN F BOITANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

21-cv-01402-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)