Opinion
Submitted May 29, 1930 —
Decided February 2, 1931.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 177.
For the appellant, Robert Queen.
For the respondent, William A. Stevens, attorney-general, and Robert Peacock, assistant attorney-general.
Everything else swept aside this appears to be an appeal from a conclusion of the Supreme Court not to allow a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings and judgment of the respondent.
It is enough for us to say that the allowance of such a writ, in a matter of this character, is not a matter of right in the party seeking such review but is a matter lodged in the sound discretion of the Supreme Court and the exercise of that discretion by that court is not subject to review.
The appeal is dismissed.