From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 18, 2012
89 So. 3d 1200 (La. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2012–C–0600.

2012-05-18

Wesley C. JOHNSON v. Richard BELL, CTJ Services, Incorporated and Crum & Forster Insurance Company.


Prior report: La.App., 85 So.3d 216.

In re United States Fire Insurance Company;—Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. H, No. 2006–2284; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011–CA–1348.

Writ Granted. While dismissal is a draconian penalty which should only be applied in extreme cases, Horton v. McCary, 93–2315, p. 10 (La.4/11/94), 635 So.2d 199, 203, it does not appear that the district court abused its discretion in ordering dismissal under the facts of the present case. There is sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery was willful and warranted the harsh remedy imposed by the district court. See Hutchinson v. Westport Ins. Corp., 04–1592 (La.11/8/04), 886 So.2d 438. The Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the district court order of dismissal is reinstated.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 18, 2012
89 So. 3d 1200 (La. 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:Wesley C. JOHNSON v. Richard BELL, CTJ Services, Incorporated and Crum …

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

89 So. 3d 1200 (La. 2012)