From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Barone

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-849 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-849.

May 4, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of the petitioner for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas J. Rueter, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, petitioner's objections to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation, and all other relevant papers in the record, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's objections (paper no. 19) are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation (paper no. 10) and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (paper no. 18) are APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (paper no. 1) is DENIED.
4. Because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no basis for issuing a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Barone

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-849 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Barone

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL C. BARONE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-849 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2011)