From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Annadale Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0274-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0274-KJN

01-19-2012

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ANNADALE COMPANY, a limited partnership, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter was set for a status conference on February 2, 2012. Plaintiff, who is an attorney, has requested that the status conference be continued sixty (60) days because plaintiff will be traveling out of the country and unable to attend the conference as originally scheduled, and defendant has stipulated to the continuance. (Dkt. No. 12.) The parties represent that such a continuance would also give them time to engage in settlement discussions. (Id.)

This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

This case has been pending for nearly one year, and to date, no scheduling conference has been held. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1 (filed January 30, 2011).) While the undersigned grants the parties' stipulated request for a continuance at this time, the undersigned will not look favorably upon future requests to continue the status (pretrial scheduling) conference absent exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, plaintiff's request for a continuance is granted and the status conference currently set for February 2, 2012, is rescheduled. The undersigned shall conduct a status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this matter on April 5, 2012.

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for February 2, 2012, is rescheduled.

2. The undersigned shall conduct a status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this matter on April 5, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 25. All parties shall file status reports in accordance with Eastern District Local Rule 240(b), preferably a joint status report, at least 14 days in advance of the status (pretrial scheduling) conference. Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Annadale Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0274-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Annadale Co.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ANNADALE COMPANY, a limited partnership…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0274-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)