From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Anderson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 28, 2024
4:23cv1771 (M.D. Pa. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

4:23cv1771

05-28-2024

TRAVON JOHNSON, Plaintiff v. KATAYSHA ANDERSON, Defendant


Arbuckle Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Munley Judge

AND NOW, to wit, this 28th day of May 2024, before the court for disposition is Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle's report and recommendation, which proposes the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for such filing has passed. Therefore, in deciding whether to adopt the report and recommendation, the court must determine if a review of the record evidences plain error or manifest injustice. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) 1983 Advisory Committee Notes (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record to accept the recommendation”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Sullivan v, Cuyler, 723 F.2d 1077, 1085 (3d Cir. 1983).

After a careful review, the court finds neither a clear error on the face of the record nor a manifest injustice, and therefore, the report and recommendation shall be adopted. It is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED;

2) The plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Anderson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 28, 2024
4:23cv1771 (M.D. Pa. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Johnson v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:TRAVON JOHNSON, Plaintiff v. KATAYSHA ANDERSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

4:23cv1771 (M.D. Pa. May. 28, 2024)