From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. American Cas. Co. of Reading PA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-02125-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:09-cv-02125-SC

10-04-2011

Philip Rudolph Johnson, Plaintiff, v. American Casualty Company of Reading, PA, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendants.

JOHN E. PEER, Bar No. 95978 KATY A. NELSON, Bar No. 173759 WOOLLS & PEER A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendant American Casualty Company of Reading, PA Thomas P. Burke, II - Arizona State Bar #009631 [pro hac vice] BURKE PANZARELLA RICH Thomas G. Lewellyn - (California State Bar #111733)


JOHN E. PEER, Bar No. 95978

KATY A. NELSON, Bar No. 173759

WOOLLS & PEER

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant American Casualty Company of Reading, PA

Thomas P. Burke, II - Arizona State Bar #009631 [pro hac vice]

BURKE PANZARELLA RICH

Thomas G. Lewellyn - (California State Bar #111733)

Assigned to the Hon. Samuel Conti


STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ENLARGING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Civil L.R. 6-2)

Trial Date: 3/5/2012

Pretrial Conference: 2/24/2012

Discovery Cutoff Date: 9/30/2011

Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to court order on September 20, 2011. Responses are currently due on October 7, 2012.

The parties have been diligently engaged in scheduling and taking percipient witness depositions and expert depositions, which were completed on September 29, 2011, and the parties are preparing for mediation on October 6, 2011.

The parties' efforts are currently focused on the October 6th mediation. The the trial was continued from November 15, 2011 to March 5, 2012, and the parties agree that a short extension of time for defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint may help facilitate settlement discussions and also is reasonable under the circumstances.

Accordingly the parties, through their attorneys of record herein, stipulate that the deadline for defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint be extended from October 7, 2011 to October 21, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

WOOLLS & PEER

A Professional Corporation

JOHN E. PEER

KATY A. NELSON

Attorneys for Defendant American Casualty

Company of Reading, PA

BURKE PANZARELLA RICH

Thomas P. Burke, II

Attorney for Plaintiff Philip Rudolph Johnson

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Order is hereby approved and adopted as the Order of the Court.

Hon. Samuel Conti


Summaries of

Johnson v. American Cas. Co. of Reading PA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-02125-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. American Cas. Co. of Reading PA

Case Details

Full title:Philip Rudolph Johnson, Plaintiff, v. American Casualty Company of Reading…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-02125-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)