From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 23, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1396 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1396 LKK DAD P.

October 23, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 25, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 1) is denied.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 23, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1396 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Johnson v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:TRACY A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 23, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1396 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2009)