Opinion
March 5, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.).
The IAS Court properly found that the documentary evidence conclusively establishes that plaintiff was not a bona fide tenant of the subject apartment at the time the conversion plan for the building in which the apartment was located was offered for filing. Plaintiff, therefore, neither had nor could have been deprived of the right to purchase the apartment as an insider. We have considered plaintiff's various and largely factual arguments to the contrary and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Williams, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.