From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John v. Great Neck Union Free S.D

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 2007
42 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-06848.

July 10, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered June 26, 2006, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability in favor of the defendant, dismissed the complaint.

Landers Cernigliaro, P.C., Carle Place, N.Y. (Frank G. Cernigliaro of counsel), for appellant.

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Uniondale, N.Y. (Christine Gasser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Balkin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiff's request to charge the jury that the defendant was under a duty to use special skill and care as set forth in PJI 2:15 (2006 Supp) ( see Krey v Board of Educ., of Scarsdale Union Free School Dist., 202 AD2d 397). The plaintiff failed to show that the defendant relied on its employee's special skills in the performance of her job ( see PJI 2:15 [2006 Supp]). Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence of the standard of care applicable to the employee in her profession ( see De Maria v Renee Operating Corp., 282 App Div 221 [1953]).


Summaries of

John v. Great Neck Union Free S.D

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 2007
42 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

John v. Great Neck Union Free S.D

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN WILLIAM JOHN, Appellant, v. GREAT NECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 10, 2007

Citations

42 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6027
839 N.Y.S.2d 540

Citing Cases

Reis v. Volvo Cars of N. Am.

Plaintiffs were not required to prove universal application of the practice in order for the jury to consider…

Page v. Monroe

Lewis Aff. ¶ 11 (Dkt. No. 190). Defendants have failed to provide sufficient evidence of the standard of care…