From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John Schumacher State Bank v. Tschiedel

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Mar 25, 1936
92 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)

Opinion

No. 8478, Motion No. 8315.

March 25, 1936.

Appeal from District Court, Fayette County; M. C. Jeffrey, Judge.

Application to the probate court by the John Schumacher State Bank, liquidator of the First State Bank of Ellinger, for an order requiring C. J. Tschiedel, guardian of the estate of O. F. Tschiedel, non compos mentis, to sell sufficient property to pay judgment which the First State Bank of Ellinger had recovered against C. J. Tschiedel, guardian of the estate of O. F. Tschiedel, non compos mentis. From a judgment of the district court setting aside an order of the probate court directing the sale of certain property, the John Schumacher State Bank, liquidator of the First State Bank of Ellinger, appeals.

Reversed, and proceedings dismissed without prejudice.

C. C. Jopling, of La Grange, for appellant.

Moss Moss, of La Grange, for appellee.


The First State Bank of Ellinger recovered a judgment for $215.15 against appellee, in his capacity as guardian of the estate of O. F. Tschiedel, non compos mentis, which judgment was certified to the probate court of Fayette county, where the estate was pending, and was duly allowed as a claim against the estate. There being no funds in the estate, appellant, as liquidator of the Ellinger Bank, applied to the probate court for an order requiring the guardian to sell sufficient property to pay the judgment. Upon hearing of this motion, it was found that the only asset of the estate consisted of a one-half undivided interest in 263 acres of land which was community property of the ward and his deceased wife, and was subject to the ward's homestead interest therein. The probate court ordered sale of the ward's half interest in the 63-acre excess over the homestead exemption. Upon appeal by the guardian to the district court, judgment was rendered setting aside the order upon the ground that, since the ward's half interest in the entire tract was less than 200 acres, his entire interest therein was exempt from sale for his debts. The instant appeal is from this judgment.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the controversy has become moot by reason of the fact that, subsequently to the appeal herein, a judgment was rendered in the probate court of Fayette county adjudging (after due hearing, and trial to a jury) that O. F. Tschiedel has been restored to his right mind and ordering him discharged from further guardianship. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of this judgment and a certified copy of an order of said probate court approving the final account of the guardian, closing the estate, and discharging the guardian.

R.C.S. art. 4296, provides: "When the ward dies, or if a minor, arrives at the age of twenty-one years, or if a female, marries, or, if a person of unsound mind or habitual drunkard, is restored and discharged from guardianship, the guardianship shall be immediately settled and closed and the guardian discharged, as provided in this chapter."

This article gives to restoration to sanity and discharge from guardianship of a person non compos mentis the same effect upon the guardianship as that of death of the ward. It is now settled in this state that death of the ward terminates the power of the probate court to sell real estate to pay debts of the ward's estate. Easterline v. Bean, 121 Tex. 327, 49 S.W.2d 427; Alford v. Halbert, 74 Tex. 346, 12 S.W. 75.

It is manifest that the probate court has no jurisdiction to sell the property to pay the ward's debt; and, since this is the only relief which is sought or could be awarded in this proceeding, all questions involved in the appeal have become moot. Since, however, the trial court's judgment denies to appellant the right to resort to the property in question in payment of its debt, the proper practice is to reverse the trial court's judgment and dismiss the proceeding without prejudice to the rights of any of the litigants. Danciger Oil Ref. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 122 Tex. 243, 56 S.W.2d 1075; Teer v. McGann (Tex.Civ.App.) 65 S.W.2d 362. It is so ordered.

Judgment reversed, and proceedings dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

John Schumacher State Bank v. Tschiedel

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Mar 25, 1936
92 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)
Case details for

John Schumacher State Bank v. Tschiedel

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SCHUMACHER STATE BANK v. TSCHIEDEL

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: Mar 25, 1936

Citations

92 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. v. County Court

We are of the opinion that such was the limit of the county court's jurisdiction. The following citations of…

Clower v. Sanders

Upon death of a ward, the guardianship is terminated ipso facto and the only power which the court retains is…