From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Vazquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2017
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00234-BRO-JEM (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2017)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00234-BRO-JEM

05-12-2017

JOHN DOE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. DAMIEN VAZQUEZ, an individual, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Salar Atrizadeh, Esq. (SBN: 255659) LAW OFFICES OF SALAR ATRIZADEH 9701 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: 310-694-3034 Facsimile: 310-694-3057 Email: salar@atrizadeh.com Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN DOE


Salar Atrizadeh, Esq. (SBN: 255659)
LAW OFFICES OF SALAR ATRIZADEH
9701 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone: 310-694-3034
Facsimile: 310-694-3057
Email: salar@atrizadeh.com Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHN DOE

JUDGMENT

TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, IF ANY:

It appears from the records in the above-entitled action that the Summons and Complaint have been served upon Defendant Damien Vazquez and it further appears from Plaintiff John Doe's Application for Default Judgment, declarations, and other evidence, as required by F.R.Civ.P. 55(a)-(b), that Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in the above-captioned action as directed in the Summons and Complaint and as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that Defendant is not a minor or incompetent person, is not currently serving in the military, is not an officer or an agency of the United States, and is not a foreign state or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign state. It also appears that Plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation.

The Court hereby enters default judgment in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant on the following causes of action: (1) Invasion of privacy; (2) Civil harassment in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6; (3) Civil stalking in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 1708.7 et seq.; (4) Cyber exploitation in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 1708.85 et seq.; and (5) Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Furthermore, the Court awards to Plaintiff damages in the amount of $97,593.15, as well as attorney's fees in the amount of $5,503.73. The total amount of the judgment, which is $103,096.88, shall bear post-judgment interest at a rate calculated in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 12, 2017

By: /s/_________

Honorable Beverly R. O'Connell

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Doe v. Vazquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2017
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00234-BRO-JEM (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Doe v. Vazquez

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. DAMIEN VAZQUEZ, an individual, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 12, 2017

Citations

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00234-BRO-JEM (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2017)