From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johansen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01915-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01915-AP

11-01-2012

JONATHAN E. JOHANSEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger McDivitt Law Firm For Defendant: Jessica Milano Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger

McDivitt Law Firm
For Defendant: Jessica Milano

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 23, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: July 31, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 1, 2012 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate the need for additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSESOTHER MATTERS

This case raises no unusual claims or defenses.

7. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: November 21, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: December 21, 2012

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief Due: January 7, 2013

8. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

The parties do not request oral argument.

9. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge.

10. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C. COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED: _____________
Christopher R. Alger
McDivitt Law Firm
Attorney for Plaintiff Jonathan E. Johansen
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _____________
By: Jessica Milano
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration


Summaries of

Johansen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01915-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Johansen v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN E. JOHANSEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01915-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)