From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johannsen v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2006
34 A.D.3d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

9183.

November 21, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered February 3, 2006, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed, The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


Plaintiff contends that she tripped on a plastic packaging hoop while walking on the sidewalk near defendants' alleyway dumpsters and that refuse had been present on the subject sidewalk area on many occasions. It is undisputed that at the time of the accident, defendants were under no statutory duty to maintain the sidewalk. Plaintiff claims that defendants created the dangerous condition because no other store on the subject street, but for defendants' store, disposed of plastic packaging hoops similar to the one that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall. This averment was contained in an attorney's affirmation submitted in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. It was not made on the basis of personal knowledge of the facts or supported by evidence in admissible form and, therefore, was insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment ( Diaz v New York City Tr. Auth., 12 AD3d 316; Ramos v New York City Hous. Auth., 264 AD2d 568).


Summaries of

Johannsen v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2006
34 A.D.3d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Johannsen v. Rudolph

Case Details

Full title:THEA JOHANNSEN, Respondent, v. BESTANY RUDOLPH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8648
824 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Koch v. Sheresky, Aronson & Mayefsky LLP

Thus, no assertion of wrongdoing as found in the November 2005 Order could possibly be extended to the…

YING LUAN YANG v. YUSUPOV

Thus, the affirmation is without probative value. See Zuckerman v City of New York, supra at 563; Johannsen v…