From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joel Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Apr 6, 2018
890 F.3d 1124 (3d Cir. 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-3113

04-06-2018

Joel DOE, a Minor, BY AND THROUGH his Guardians John DOE and Jane Doe; Macy Roe; Mary Smith; Jack Jones, a minor, by and through his Parents John Jones and Jane Jones, *Chloe Johnson, a minor by and through her Parent Jane Johnson; *James Jones, a Minor by and through his Parents John Jones and Jane Jones, Appellants v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; Dr. Brett Cooper, In his official capacity as Principal; Dr. E. Wayne Foley, In his official capacity as Assistant Principal ; David Krem, Acting Superintendent Pennsylvania Youth Congress Foundation (Intervenor in D.C.) *(Pursuant to Court Order dated 04/06/18)


JUDGMENT

We agree Plaintiffs have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and that they have not established that they will be irreparably harmed if their Motion to Enjoin the Boyertown School District’s policy is denied.

We therefore Affirm the District Court’s denial of a preliminary injunction substantially for the reasons that the Court explained in its exceptionally well reasoned Opinion of August 25, 2017.

A formal Opinion will follow. The mandate shall issue forthwith. The time for filing a petition for rehearing will run from the date that the Court’s formal opinion is entered on the docket.


Summaries of

Joel Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Apr 6, 2018
890 F.3d 1124 (3d Cir. 2018)
Case details for

Joel Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Joel DOE, a Minor, BY AND THROUGH his Guardians John DOE and Jane Doe…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Date published: Apr 6, 2018

Citations

890 F.3d 1124 (3d Cir. 2018)