From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe v. Stickney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2374-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2374-G (BN)

01-19-2018

DEMARCUS KENARD JOE (TDCJ No. 1047716), Petitioner, v. PAUL D. STICKNEY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The district court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED. January 19, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Joe v. Stickney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2374-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Joe v. Stickney

Case Details

Full title:DEMARCUS KENARD JOE (TDCJ No. 1047716), Petitioner, v. PAUL D. STICKNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 19, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2374-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)