From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe v. Schultz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 4, 2024
2:23-cv-10424-JLS-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-10424-JLS-KES

11-04-2024

WARDELL JOE, Petitioner, v. JASON SCHULTZ, Acting Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 27). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 29) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition in its entirety without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction or, alternatively, dismissing only grounds two and three without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and dismissing ground one with prejudice as not cognizable.


Summaries of

Joe v. Schultz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 4, 2024
2:23-cv-10424-JLS-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Joe v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:WARDELL JOE, Petitioner, v. JASON SCHULTZ, Acting Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 4, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-10424-JLS-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2024)