From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe v. Hargrove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 3, 2011
10 Civ. 4737 (JSR)(THK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

10 Civ. 4737 (JSR)(THK)

11-03-2011

DARRELL JOE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL HARGROVE, et al., Respondent.


ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J,

On July 8, 2 011, the Honorable Theodore H. Katz, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above captioned matter recommending dismissal of the action with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Subsequently, on July 26, 2011, plaintiff submitted objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the petition and the underlying record de novo.

Having done so, the Court finds itself in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Katz's Report and Recommendation and hereby adopts its reasoning by reference. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the action, with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ordered to close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

November 3, 2011

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Joe v. Hargrove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 3, 2011
10 Civ. 4737 (JSR)(THK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Joe v. Hargrove

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL JOE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL HARGROVE, et al., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

10 Civ. 4737 (JSR)(THK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2011)