From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.K. v. Hudson City Sch. Bd. of Educ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
CASE NO. 5:14CV1985 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:14CV1985

09-28-2015

J.K., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hudson City School Board of Education, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

On September 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 23) recommending that the Court DENY Plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the administrative record and affirm the decisions made by numerous administrative officials.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. No one has raised any objections. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. Plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the administrate record is DENIED. Plaintiffs' assignments of error are overruled and the decisions of the independent hearing officer and state level review officer are affirmed. This matter is hereby closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2015

/s/ John R . Adams

JOHN R. ADAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

J.K. v. Hudson City Sch. Bd. of Educ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
CASE NO. 5:14CV1985 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

J.K. v. Hudson City Sch. Bd. of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:J.K., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hudson City School Board of Education…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 5:14CV1985 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)