From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JJ Outdoor Advertising v. Dot

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 25, 2001
22 P.3d 780 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

58448, 64740; A110238

Argued and submitted April 9, 2001.

Filed: April 25, 2001

Judicial Review from Department of Transportation.

Joan M. Chambers argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Kulla, Ronnau, Schaub Chambers, P.C.

Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Transportation (Department) requiring petitioner to remove certain signs that the Department determined had been erected in violation of the Oregon Motorists Information Act, ORS 377.700 et seq. Petitioner argues that the Act violates Article I, sections 8 and 20, of the Oregon Constitution, and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. We addressed, and rejected, most of petitioner's contentions in Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. State of Oregon, 150 Or. App. 106, 945 P.2d 614 (1997), aff'd on other grounds 331 Or. 634, 20 P.3d 180 (2001). The balance of petitioner's contentions in this case we reject without discussion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

JJ Outdoor Advertising v. Dot

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 25, 2001
22 P.3d 780 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

JJ Outdoor Advertising v. Dot

Case Details

Full title:JJ OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 25, 2001

Citations

22 P.3d 780 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
22 P.3d 780

Citing Cases

Petitions for Review

November 27, 2001Anderson v. Swift Transportation (A108095) (S48920) ( 176 Or. App. 361) Astorga, Eliasar…