From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jine v. Ota Franchise Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2020
Case No. 8:20-cv-00769-JVS-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 8:20-cv-00769-JVS-KES

12-04-2020

AMY JINE and ANA BIOCINI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. OTA FRANCHISE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Dismissing Action With Prejudice and Entering Judgment. Upon consideration of the request and the entire record in this action, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiffs Amy Jine and Ana Biocini's claims in favor of Defendants OTA Franchise Corporation, Newport Exchange Holdings, Inc., NEH Services, Inc., Eyal Shahar, and Samuel R. Seiden (collectively, "Defendants") based on the Court finding that the dispute is arbitrable. See Civil Minutes - General (Sept. 11, 2020), ECF No. 45 (order compelling arbitration).

2. This Court hereby dismisses this action on the merits with prejudice against the Defendants, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED. Dated: December 04, 2020

/s/ _________

James V. Selna

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jine v. Ota Franchise Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2020
Case No. 8:20-cv-00769-JVS-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Jine v. Ota Franchise Corp.

Case Details

Full title:AMY JINE and ANA BIOCINI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 4, 2020

Citations

Case No. 8:20-cv-00769-JVS-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2020)