From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jin Rie v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 15, 2008
296 F. App'x 586 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-55099.

Submitted October 6, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 15, 2008.

Jin Rie, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Jonathan B. Cole, Esquire, Nemecek Cole, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-04582-CAS.

Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appellant Jin Rie appeals a district court judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by the doctrines of state sovereign immunity, judicial immunity, res judicata and Rooker-Feldman. On April 18, 2008, this court issued an order to show cause why the district court's judgment should not be summarily affirmed.

A review of the record and the response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jin Rie v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 15, 2008
296 F. App'x 586 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Jin Rie v. California

Case Details

Full title:JIN RIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, a government; et…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

296 F. App'x 586 (9th Cir. 2008)