From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jiminez v. Vaughan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 2009
341 F. App'x 890 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-7099.

Submitted: July 15, 2009.

Decided: August 25, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:07-cv-00639-MHL).

John E. Davidson, Davidson Kitzmann, PLC, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, Benjamin H. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Miguel Jiminez seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jiminez v. Vaughan, No. 3:07-cv-00639-MHL, 2008 WL 2329767 (E.D. Va. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jiminez v. Vaughan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 2009
341 F. App'x 890 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Jiminez v. Vaughan

Case Details

Full title:Miguel JIMINEZ, a/k/a Miguel Jiminez Gomez, Petitioner-Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

341 F. App'x 890 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Jiminez v. Vaughan

Miguel JIMINEZ, petitioner, v. Douglas M. VAUGHAN, Warden.Case below, 341 Fed.Appx. 890. Petition for writ of…