From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Whorton

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 3, 2008
3:08-cv-00047-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2008)

Opinion

3:08-cv-00047-LRH-RAM.

November 3, 2008


ORDER


The petitioner's motion (#20) for an extension of time is GRANTED, and the time for the petitioner to mail an opposition to the respondents' motion to dismiss to the Clerk for filing is extended up to and including December 18, 2008. The Court notes that the sixty-day deadline in its prior order (#12) expressly overrode any shorter deadline in the Klingele minute order. The petitioner's further request in his motion for an order for service of the motion to dismiss has been mooted by the respondents' corrected service of the motion. See #21.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Whorton

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 3, 2008
3:08-cv-00047-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Whorton

Case Details

Full title:FERNANDO R. JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. GLEN WHORTON, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Nov 3, 2008

Citations

3:08-cv-00047-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2008)