From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
1:07cv1689 LJO DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)

Opinion

1:07cv1689 LJO DLB.

October 3, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Document 8)


Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed the instant action on November 21, 2007.

On August 27, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the action be DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On September 29, 2008, plaintiff filedobjections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated August 27, 2008, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. The action is DISMISSED.

This terminates this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
1:07cv1689 LJO DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2008

Citations

1:07cv1689 LJO DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)