From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 17, 1997
698 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-241

Opinion filed September 17, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Joni Braunstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the order revoking defendant's probation based on commission of grand theft and failure to participate in the TASC program. However, as the state properly concedes, the order is inconsistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement that the state did not prove defendant's ability to pay costs. Cushion v. State, 637 So.2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to strike from the order defendant's failure to pay costs as an additional ground for revocation. This modification does not require the presence of the defendant.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 17, 1997
698 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Jimenez v. State

Case Details

Full title:YADIRA JIMENEZ, APPELLANT, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 17, 1997

Citations

698 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Sconiers v. State

A written revocation order must conform to the trial judge's oral pronouncements. See Jimenez v. State, 698…

Robinson v. State

A written revocation order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement. See Jimenez v. State, 698…