From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jiménez v. Palacios

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jul 22, 2020
No. 399, 2019 (Del. Jul. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 399, 2019

07-22-2020

RODOLFO ENRIQUE JIMÉNEZ, ASDRÚBAL CHAVEZ, IRIS MEDINA, MARCOS ROJAS, JOSÉ ALEJANDRO ROJAS, and FERNANDO DE QUINTAL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Below/Appellants, v. LUISA PALACIOS, EDGAR RINCÓN, FERNANDO VERA, ELIO TORTOLERO, ANDRÉS PADILLA, ÁNGEL OLMETA, JAVIER TROCONIS, LUIS URDANETA, and RICK ESSER, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Below/Appellees.


Court Below - Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware C.A. No. 2019-0490 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices. ORDER

This 22nd day of July 2020, after careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its August 12, 2019 opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J . Seitz, Jr.

Chief Justice


Summaries of

Jiménez v. Palacios

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jul 22, 2020
No. 399, 2019 (Del. Jul. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Jiménez v. Palacios

Case Details

Full title:RODOLFO ENRIQUE JIMÉNEZ, ASDRÚBAL CHAVEZ, IRIS MEDINA, MARCOS ROJAS, JOS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jul 22, 2020

Citations

No. 399, 2019 (Del. Jul. 22, 2020)