From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. McConnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 1, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1191-P (W.D. La. Mar. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1191-P

03-01-2021

MARK ANTHONY JIMENEZ, Petitioner v. CHRIS MCCONNELL, Respondent


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the Response in Support filed by Petitioner (ECF No. 18), and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 1, 5) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE as to the jurisdictional issue, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of Jimenez's claim.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers, on this 1st day of March 2021.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jimenez v. McConnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 1, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1191-P (W.D. La. Mar. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Jimenez v. McConnell

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY JIMENEZ, Petitioner v. CHRIS MCCONNELL, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 1, 2021

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1191-P (W.D. La. Mar. 1, 2021)