From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Jewelry Express, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 23, 2021
2:21-cv-01373-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01373-WBS-KJN

12-23-2021

FLOR JIMENEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. JEWELRY EXPRESS, INC. d/b/a KEVIN JEWELERS, a California corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants

Jack M. Zakariaie Nilou Zakariaie ZAKARIAIE & ZAKARIAIE Attorneys for Defendant JEWELRY EXPRESS, INC.


Jack M. Zakariaie Nilou Zakariaie ZAKARIAIE & ZAKARIAIE Attorneys for Defendant JEWELRY EXPRESS, INC.

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Stipulation to Extend the Time for Defendant JEWELRY EXPRESS, INC., a California Corporation (“Defendant”), to respond to the Initial Complaint of Plaintiff FLOR JIMENEZ.

Having reviewed the Stipulation, and having found good cause to approve, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Stipulation is hereby APPROVED.
2. Defendants' deadline to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Initial Complaint is extended to January 24, 2022.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Jewelry Express, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 23, 2021
2:21-cv-01373-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Jewelry Express, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FLOR JIMENEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 23, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01373-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2021)