noting that the claimant "failed to show that any physician had a continuing medical relationship with him that would justify considering such a doctor as his 'treating' physician as defined by" 20 C.F.R. § 404.1502
Summary of this case from Osborn v. BerryhillNo. 00-50366.
February 28, 2001.
Appeal from W.D.Tex.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
noting that the claimant "failed to show that any physician had a continuing medical relationship with him that would justify considering such a doctor as his 'treating' physician as defined by" 20 C.F.R. § 404.1502
Summary of this case from Osborn v. BerryhillFull title:JIMENEZ v. HALTER
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Feb 28, 2001
Dr. Ryser appears to have conducted one psychological evaluation of Ms. Osborn. There is no indication that…