From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Cofaci Foods Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 19, 2022
1:21-cv-8620-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-8620-GHW

09-19-2022

GUADALUPE JIMENEZ, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. COFACI FOODS INC. DBA BORINQUEN SUPER MARKET and LILLIAN CASTILLO, Defendants.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

The Court declines to take action with respect to the proposed order to show cause, Dkt. No. 41, because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, in particular Rule 3(G). Any renewed application for an order to show cause must comply with the Court's Individual Rules, which require, among other things, that counsel provide a memorandum of law addressing all of the issues detailed in Attachment A of the Court's Individual Rules. Counsel is directed to review and fully comply with the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on all Defendants in this action and to retain proof of service.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Cofaci Foods Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 19, 2022
1:21-cv-8620-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Cofaci Foods Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GUADALUPE JIMENEZ, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 19, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-8620-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)