Opinion
2019–05820 Index No. 616167/18
07-01-2020
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. (Christopher J. Whitton of counsel), for appellants.
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. (Christopher J. Whitton of counsel), for appellants.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kevin Benson and Guardian Bus Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Antonio I. Brandveen, J.), entered March 12, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, in effect, upon granting that branch of the motion of the defendants Kevin Benson and Guardian Bus Company which was pursuant to CPLR 602 to consolidate this action with an action entitled Brenda M. Jurado v Guardian Bus Company, Inc., and Kevin L. Benson, commenced in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 711192/18, to the extent of directing a joint trial, denied that branch of the motion of those defendants which was to place venue of the action in Nassau County, directed that the actions be tried jointly in Queens County, and directed that this action be transferred to Queens County.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
On July 20, 2018, Brenda M. Jurado commenced a personal injury action against the defendants Guardian Bus Company, Inc., and Kevin L. Benson in the Supreme Court, Queens County (hereinafter the first action). On December 4, 2018, Mirian Jimenez, a passenger in Jurado's vehicle, commenced this personal injury action in the Supreme Court, Nassau County. The defendants Kevin Benson and Guardian Bus Company (hereinafter together the appellants) moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 602 consolidating the two actions for the purpose of a joint trial in Nassau County. The Supreme Court, in effect, granted that branch of the appellant's motion which was to consolidate the two actions to the extent of directing that the actions be tried jointly, denied that branch of the motion which was to place venue in Nassau County, directed that the actions be tried jointly in Queens County, and directed that this action be transferred to Queens County. This appeal ensued.
"When a trial court orders consolidation or joint trials under CPLR 602(a), venue should generally be placed in the county where jurisdiction was invoked in the first action" ( Nova Cas. Co. v. RPE, LLC, 115 A.D.3d 717, 718, 981 N.Y.S.2d 582 ; see Castro v. Durban, 129 A.D.3d 652, 653, 11 N.Y.S.3d 614 ; Brown v. Cope Bestway Express, Inc., 99 A.D.3d 746, 748, 952 N.Y.S.2d 220 ). However, special circumstances may warrant the court, in its discretion, to place venue elsewhere (see Castro v. Durban, 129 A.D.3d at 653, 11 N.Y.S.3d 614 ; Nova Cas. Co. v. RPE, LLC, 115 A.D.3d at 718, 981 N.Y.S.2d 582 ; Brown v. Cope Bestway Express, Inc., 99 A.D.3d at 748, 952 N.Y.S.2d 220 ). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in placing venue in Queens County, where jurisdiction was invoked in the first action, as the appellants failed to establish special circumstances which would warrant venue being placed in Nassau County (see Tieshmaker v. EMB Contr. Corp., 143 A.D.3d 886, 887, 40 N.Y.S.3d 153 ; Arduino v. Molina–Ovando, 141 A.D.3d 622, 623, 36 N.Y.S.3d 186 ; see also Longo v. Fogg, 150 A.D.3d 724, 725–726, 55 N.Y.S.3d 61 ).
CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.